Pursuing the Homosexual Agenda
by Lien of Oz
As Christianity burst out of the Middle Eastern World at the beginning of the common era (CE) deviant sexual practices, pederasty and same-sex relationships, common in the then known Greco-Roman world gradually disappeared from public practice, observation and/ or acceptance. However, over the last 30 or 40 years, a new homosexual movement, has come out of the closet, to pursue an agenda leading the community to again accept the pagan practices which Judeo-Christian philosophy and ethic largely suppressed. All the old vices and promiscuities are again being promoted throughout society and paraded as human rights or diversities that should be politically protected.
The homosexual community, in particular, are promoting an agenda demanding society accept their lifestyle as a normal, natural expression, of one of many forms of sexuality*; openly exhibiting their activities as a source of pride.
* Such as Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals and Trans-gendered persons.
The demoralizing consequences in and upon society are becoming more and more evident in changing cultural norms, depreciating marriage and family, compromising the Church, arresting media attention, influencing eduction, and negatively, the medical health of the community.
We would do well to heed the persuasive objectives of the homosexual agenda which has remained essentially unchanged since initially launched in the early 70’s.
All sex acts between consenting adults to be decriminalised.
Homosexuals or Gays to be provided, by special laws if necessary, free access to media and other forms of public expression.
Gays assured of protection of (human) rights, through formal equal opportunity and anti-discrimination, legislation.
Gays (& lesbians) to be given the equal rights of marriage and parenting.
Gays (& lesbians) are to be afforded protection, under law, from all forms of harassment and expressions of intolerance.
With the outbreak of HIV/AIDS, formerly GRID (Gay Related Immuno-Deficiency), the homosexual community have demanded that government/s :
prohibit discrimination against HIV positive persons and people with or perceived to have AIDS.
(a) fund massive AIDS education
(b) implement prevention programs
(c) introduce culturally sensitive,(lesbian and gay affirming, sex positive) safe-sex education to all youth and
Strategies of these kind were first proposed by ‘Gay’ activist Dennis Altman in "The Homosexualization of America" in 1982, and later debated in a ‘Gay Council of War’ of 175 leading ‘gay’ activists in Warrenton; Virginia near Washington DC in 1988. Details of their agenda had previously been documented in the November issue of the Gay Journal –Guide– by Kirk and Pill * under the Title–"the Overhauling of Straight America". Excerpts from this document are to be found in the attached appendix. (*Erastes Pill was a pseudonym used by Hunter Madsen)
A far more detailed account for achieving homosexual goals were drafted by the activists, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, in their book– After The Ball: How America (& the West) will conquer its fear and hatred of Gays in the 90’s. (New York: Plume 1990)
This publication has outlined the ‘propaganda campaign’ to normalise homosexuality, as an (acceptable) alternative lifestyle through planned ‘brainwashing’ on a massive scale.
The authors state… "At the core of our program is a media campaign to change the way average citizens view homosexuality."
The Authors and their purpose
Both Kirk and Madsen are Harvard trained academics educated respectively in social psychology
and commercial advertising. Their particular career backgrounds provided the ideal combination to achieve their planned three stage strategy to [A] desensitise, [B] jam, and finally [C] convert, an innocent community and reshape public opinion and attitudes toward acceptance of homosexuality– namely-gays; lesbians; bisexuals and also transsexuals.
From a Lesbian perspective we might also name Tammy Bruce# confirming the above authors planned strategies:–"What is pitched is different –not a product brand versus an issue–but the method is the same. In each case, the critical thing is not to let the public know how it is (to be) done." Kirk and Madsen initiated,( in their words), a "carefully planned and calculated, public relations propaganda campaign." …. "To one extent or another, the separability and manipulability of any verbal label is the basis for all abstract principles underlying our proposed campaign." (p. 129)
In establishing these strategies… "we can hope (our ambition is) to re-shape American Law and society". And in turn the rest of western culture.
# The New thought Police 196; 2001
To desensitise, jam and convert society, Kirk and Madsen envisioned a society that could be conditioned to arrive at a conclusion and acceptance of homosexuality it thinks is its own.
A principal aim of the Kirk and Madsen propaganda was to [i] repackage and re-create a new homosexual identity, [ii] avoid behavioural issues and emphasise rights; and [iii] to present homosexual persons in favourable, even superior light…"to paint gay men and lesbians as superior pillars of society…to use historical figures…firstly because they are already dead "….and …." In no position to deny the truth…moreover school history books have already set them in incontrovertible cement.." ….."Famous historical figures are considered especially useful to us; not only do they bring prestige, they’re also invariably dead as a door nail, hence in no position to deny the truth and sue for libel.’’ (p 188)
Desensitisation to quote the authors means to subject the public "…to a continuous flood of gay related advertising, presented in the least offensive fashion possible. If straights can’t shut off the shower, they may at least get used to being wet." (p 149)
" The main thing is to talk about gayness until the issue become thoroughly tiresome .(p178)…If you can get [the straight public] to think that homosexuality is just another thing….meriting no more than a shrug of the shoulders… then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won." (p 177)
We must change the rights approaches….."dismissing the (gay) movements out-worn techniques in favour of a carefully calculated public relations propaganda….laying ground work for the next (new) stage of the gay revolution and its ultimate victory over bigotry". (see cover intro.)
"First you get the foot in the door by being as similar as possible; then and only then–when your one little difference [sexual orientation] is finally accepted– can you start dragging in your other peculiarities; one by one." (p 146)
Now we can begin to understand why we are seemingly bombarded by continual references to the disadvantaged homosexual minority through the TV , print and other media.
Kirk and Madsen proposed that where it was not possible to de-sensitise or silence critics then…
"demonise them" (p 148) and thereby.. ‘’depict homophobic and homo-hating bigots as loud-mouths and assholes…." (p 151)
Identifying homosexual behaviour as a choice must clearly be avoided… "as this would ….open a can of worms labelled moral choice and sin and give the religious right intransigents a stick to beat us with…" (p.184 )
Camille Paglia, a lesbian activist has had the courage to boldly state what most homosexuals refuse to admit: "Homosexuality is not 'normal.' On the contrary, it is a challenge to the norm" Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature, procreation is the single relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction "No one is born gay. The idea is ridiculous "homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait". (VAMPS & TRAMPS 70-72 ;1994)
Homosexual activists, of course, claim that their behaviour is "normal" and that's why the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed homosexuality as a Gender Identity Disorder in 1973. What they fail to admit, however, is that homosexual activists literally terrorized the APA into removing homosexuality as a disorder.
Homosexual scientist Simon LeVay admits this. He notes: "Gay activism was clearly the force that propelled the APA to declassify homosexuality."
In After the Ball, Kirk and Madsen planned their agenda to get society to accept the homosexual lifestyle, stating…."Our campaign should not demand explicit support for homosexual practices but should take instead anti-discrimination as its theme." (p. 187)
These "homosexual marketeers" aimed to direct attention away from behaviour and to advertise that homosexuality was…. .."no longer a choice" but "an innate and immutable" sexual orientation. Therefore,….. "unchangeable, even healthy and deserving protection as a right".
LeVay (cont. from above) made an interesting observation about the emphasis on the biology of homosexuality. He noted, "...people who think that gays and lesbians are born that way are also more likely to support gay rights."
Kirk and Madsen aggressively assert that some intransigents…."still feel compelled to adhere rigidly to an authoritarian belief structure (e.g. orthodox religion) that condemns homosexuality. Our primary objective regarding die-hard homo-haters of this sort is to cow and silence them as far as possible, not to convert or even desensitise them…. The ambivalent sceptics are our most promising target. If we can win them over, produce a major realignment solidly in favour of gay rights, the intransigents (like the racists of twenty years ago) will eventually be effectively silenced by both law and polite society." (p 276)
In pursuit of social desensitising Kirk and Madsen advocated… "avoiding free and open debate and to target an un-bigoted youthful audience." (p-121-27)
Kirk and Madsen confessed that their "conspiracy" would need to create an image of a multitudinous gay community. In this respect to persistently repeat the now discredited Kinsey research of 1948 suggesting that at least 10% and up to 37% of males, were homosexually inclined. This 10% mythology is still affirmed in publicly sponsored documentation. [this hoax has been acknowledged [in court] by a consortium of 31 homosexual activist groups]
The same desensitising strategies were actually proposed by the now discredited Kinsey programs of the 50’s …silencing, desensitizing, jamming, converting, mobilising and demonising.
Kirk and Madsen further emphasised the need to cover up male promiscuity and the predation toward youth and boys and promote a picture "…of faultless victims of bigotry".
Concepts of this kind were to be exemplified in model advertisements….(pp 213-45)
Kirk and Madsen addressed the issue of the AIDS epidemic accepting its origins within the ‘gay community’ but devising how …. "it could be used to advantage and to present the homosexual community, not so much as high risk, but as a victimised minority and thus deserving of special protection and care…." (p 28-29)
In a social climate of community tolerance, Kirk and Madsen …."envisioned that the time was ripe for acceptance of lifestyle diversity that could be supported both by law and culture."
Jamming can be achieved, wrote Kirk and Madsen…. "by smearing those who disagree with our agenda…….Jam homo-hatred by linking it with Nazi horror or images of KKK demanding gays be slaughtered" and labelling conservatives "as hysterical backwoods preachers" others as "menacing punks" and linking "Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed." (p 221)
They further write that …"gays can [easily] undermine the moral authority of homo-hating churches over the less fervent adherents by portraying them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step…" (p 179)
" We must link homo-hating bigotry with all manner of attributes that (even) the bigot would be ashamed to possess….with unpleasant and (even) scary social consequences." (p 151-52)
"We should depict homosexual suffering as a result of homo-hatred." (i.e. homophobia.)
…"The bigot need not actually be made to believe…that others will now despise him rather our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic or proof….the more the bigot is distracted by any incidental, even specious, surface arguments, the less conscious he’ll be of the true nature of the process– which is all to the good."
"All normal persons feel shame when they perceive that they are not thinking, feeling, or acting like one of the pack....The trick is to get the bigot into the position of feeling a conflicting twinge of shame...when his homohatred surfaces. Thus, propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homohating bigots as crude loudmouths.......It can show them being criticized, hated, shunned. It can depict gays experiencing horrific suffering as the direct result of homohatred…suffering of which even most bigots would be ashamed to be the cause." (p 152-3)
Pro-gay advertising would aim at jamming contrary information and seek sympathetic political forces…. (p 147-56; 175-77) detailed by Kirk and Madsen as their –"Portfolio of Pro-Gay Advertising." (p 216-45.)
Commenting upon the media ad campaign Kirk and Madsen stated…" It makes no difference that the ads are lies; not to us, because we’re using them to ethically good effect." (p.154)
"To be accepted by the most prestigious media, such as network TV, our messages themselves will have to be–at least initially–both subtle in purpose and crafty in construction." (p 172-73)
"In the early stages of our ad campaign the public should not be shocked." (p.5 & 178)
Nevertheless, Kirk and Madsen make no effort in their book to disguise actual homosexual practices…. Such as…. Anonymous encounters in public bathhouses, sex in public toilets and
high levels of promiscuity. They are also quite open in regard to …. "the attraction given to boys within the gay scene".
But "changing public attitudes toward homosexuals would necessitate covering up the population’s sexually promiscuous conduct." Practices that even Kirk and Madsen thoroughly document.
They do acknowledge that straights may well be offended. Thus, while not condemning these practises they emphasise the need to ‘subordinate reference (to the practices) in the campaign for public acceptance." (p 34)
To cover a community’s well founded fear about child abuse---much of it blamed on gays---
Kirk and Madsen introduced a strategy to introduce ads focussing on (false) Kinsey 1 in 10 kids "…..as gays who suffer family and peer ostracism emphasising the victim imagery." ….(p 250)
Kirk and Madsen sought to avoid "guilt by association" which, until the introduction of their strategies cavorted their pederasty* with pride in the pro gay Journal "Advocate" (* now more commonly referred to as paedophilia)
This is in stark contrast to Michael Swift’s, agenda in "The Gay Revolutionary." [Reprinted from The Congressional Record and first printed in Gay Community News, (in Australia) February 15-21; 1987]
Michael Swift was an associate of the paedophile group ‘Blaze’. He affirmed the strategies of revoking laws banning homosexual activity, and legalising gay sex and the favourable portrayal of homosexual relationships on stage, screen and TV yet openly advocated…."We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, etc etc …………………. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us."
These latter comments are similar to those attributed to the North American Man-Boy Love Association –NAMBLA. Views which Kirk and Madsen requested should keep a low profile "….you offend the public more than other gays." (p 146)
Yet in the 1993 ‘Gay Pride March’ they still chanted–‘We’re here; we’re queer and we’re coming after your children!’ ( Charles W. Socarides; America,18 Nov., 1995)
Conversion "By conversion we mean something more profoundly threatening to the American way of life." A thrust which was aimed at the complete …… "conversion of the average American’s (or westerners) emotions, mind and will through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media" .. particularly TV, so that any…. "…any viewer who’s not on board with homosexuality (i.e. the bigot) is to be repeatedly exposed to literal picture/label pairs of gays…carefully selected to look either like the bigot and his friends or like any of his other stereotypes of all the right guys." (p154)…. " The bigot need not actually be made to believe . . . that others will now despise him . . . rather, our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof". (p 152)
" we mean the subverting of the mechanisms of prejudice to our own ends…..using the very process that make America hate us to turn their hatred into warm regard…whether they like it or not…" (pp. 153-54)
"We must make gays look good…. And their victimizers look bad…" (p190) so that eventually …."the very expression of anti-homosexual belief (now labelled homophobia) so socially unacceptable that even the most intransigent opposition would ultimately be silenced in public." (p.189)
One effective example of media points scoring in line with the Kirk and Madsen propaganda was the film "Philadelphia" in which Tom Hanks earned his ‘Osca’ ,as an AIDS afflicted gay man, rejected by the ‘bigoted’ representatives in a Philadelphia law firm.
Silence On Homosexual Practices
Kirk and Madsen stress that in any ad campaign details of homosexual practices must be kept low profile..
Namely the more extreme groups within the homosexual community such as the… "pederasts, gender-benders, sado-masochists, and other minorities. Moreover, common practices such as anal-oral sex, anal sex, fisting and anonymous sex - that is to say what homosexuals actually do and with how many they do it - must never be a topic."
First you get in the door, by being as similar as possible; then, and only then - when little difference [sexual orientation] is finally accepted - can you start dragging in your other peculiarities, one by one.
'Our campaign should not demand direct support for homosexual practices, but should instead take anti - discrimination as its theme"
Concerning paedophile activity Kirk and Madsen add..
Although we're not judging you, [i.e. homosexual paedophiles], others do, and very harshly, please keep a low profile, you offend the public more than other gays."
Concerning Partnering or ‘Gay Marriage’
Kirk and Madsen, in After the Ball, op. cit., pg. 330, note: "the cheating ratio of 'married' gay males, given enough time, approaches 100% ... Many gay lovers, bowing to the inevitable, agree to an 'open relationship,' for which there are as many sets of ground rules as there are couples.'
Most of the info. extracted above has been documented in far more extensive and greater detail by Paul Rondeau– Director of Development for Regent University and published in
R E G E N T U N I V E R S I T Y
L A W R E V I E W
Volume 14, Numbers 2
Paul Rondeau, explores how gay rights activists use rhetoric, psychology, social psychology, and the media–all the elements of modern marketing–to position homosexuality in order to frame what is discussed in the public arena and how it is discussed.
He is…. Director of Development for Regent University, has been a senior Sales and Marketing Management professional with industry leaders for more than 25 years.
Rondeau is now set to publish a book detailing how Americans are "being sold a bill of goods" by homosexual activists.
See also Crafting Bi/Homosexual Youth
R E G E N T U N I V E R S I T Y
L A W R E V I E W
Volume 14, Numbers 2
by Judith Reisman, exposes fraudulent sex scientists and sex education; and discusses the power and effect the media and gay rights organizations have on "turning" children gay. This articles presents undeniable proof that homosexuals are after the hearts and minds of the nation's children.
Dr. Judith Reisman, as president of the Institute for Media Instruction, has served as consultant to three U.S. Department of Justice administrations, The U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Refer Also to How America Went Gay; Charles W Socarides; America, 18 Nov. 1995
And the following Internet addresses and links……………
Lien of Oz 16 July 2003